• Yes, absolutely
  32%
• Yes, absolutely and annually
  27%
• No, too costly
  12%
• No, it is an invasion of their civil liberties
  27%

Closed

Total Votes: 62

• No, this type of ban should only apply to Olympic athletes.
  7%
• Professional athletes should also be held to the same standard.
  50%
• College athletes should be included and held to the same type of standard for their college career.
  57%
• High school athletes should be included and held to the same type of standard for their high school.
  14%
• Also, H.S. athletes, any illicit drug use (incl. alcohol) should be a “one-time offense you’re done”
  14%

Closed

Total Votes: 14

• Yes
  67%
• No
  32%

Closed

Total Votes: 28

• Rob Bradlee's makes more sense.
  66%
• Neal Gabler's holds more water.
  0%
• Neither make any sense.
  33%

Closed

Total Votes: 15

• Illegal performance-enhancement practices (HGH, Steroids, Blood Doping, etc.).
  26%
• Unethical, illegal, and inappropriate behavior exhibited by some athletes, parents and coaches.
  54%
• “Winning at all cost” attitudes.
  32%
• The general loss of perspective regarding sports participation.
  24%
• Lack of good role models at the professional and elite level of sports.
  17%
• Overinvolved sports parents.
  23%
• The overexposure of athletes in the media and the “hero” type status given to some of them.
  25%
• The trend toward sports specialization.
  18%
• Divide between those who can afford the cost of club/AAU sports competition and those who can’t.
  15%
• Educational special treatment for athletes at the college (sometimes h.s.) level.
  21%

Closed

Total Votes: 297

• No, their scholarship is enough.
  42%
• A newer system that includes scholarship plus other necessary living expenses should be adopted.
  38%
• Yes, but only those sports and athletes who bring $$$$ in.
  11%
• Yes, but all money should be divided equally to all athletes competing for the university.
  7%

Closed

Total Votes: 26

• All acts, as described in this story, are hazing and should not be tolerated.
  23%
• The squirt guns were fine, beyond that is when these cheerleaders crossed the line.
  29%
• The squirt guns and hot dog thing was all in fun, but the diapers, that crossed the line.
  29%
• None of these acts should fall under hazing since none were truly harmful to anyone.
  17%

Closed

Total Votes: 17

• Insist on the maximum sentence, in addition to at-home consequences.
  48%
• Insist on maximum sentence only.
  12%
• Whatever options are available, we would look to receive the least amount of consequence.
  24%
• I would take it to court and try to get them off completely.
  4%
• Not sure
  12%

Closed

Total Votes: 25

• Yes
  64%
• No
  14%
• Not sure
  21%

Closed

Total Votes: 56